2 Constantin Daicoviciu St.,








Obligations of the authors
The authors will fill in a form in which they declare that their manuscript is original and not plagiarized, partially or entirely, that it has not been published, is not in print or currently being considered for publication elsewhere. The authors will make sure that they hold the permission to publish all the attached documents (photographs, maps, tables, graphics, scanned images of written documents, etc.) and they have to identify correctly the sources of the materials used in the article. All those who have contributed to a paper should be listed as co-authors. When the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal as well as to cooperate with the Editorial Board to retract or correct the paper. All sources of financial support for the research project should be mentioned.

Obligations of the editorial board
The Editorial Board must ensure that all the material submitted to the journal remains confidential while under review. The Editorial Board and the editorial staff must not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.

The Editorial Board is responsible for deciding which of the submitted manuscripts should be published based on the reviewers’ evaluations. The decision to accept or reject a paper is based on its importance, originality, clarity, and its relevance to the scope of the journal. Suspected cases of plagiarism will be addressed in accordance with the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors (COPE) (see also https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Guidelines).

Obligations of the reviewers
Peer reviewers assist both the editor in making editorial decisions and the author in improving the paper. Any manuscripts received for evaluation should be treated with strict confidentiality. They must not be forwarded to or discussed with third parties, except when authorized to do so by the editor. Reviewers will evaluate the manuscripts in accordance with the evaluation form of the journal Acta Musei Napocensis. Historica (see The Peer Review Process). Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly, with supporting arguments. Reviewers should identify relevant published works that were not cited by the author. Any similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper should be reported to the Editorial Board.


Copyright agreement AMN Historica